How the estimates are ranked
This review covers public shared-reward SHA-256 services, centered on BTC and BCH, plus documented alternatives and related hashrate markets. It is a broad, dated survey, not a claim to enumerate every private operator or every SHA-256 coin. Solo-only offerings and profitability indices are outside the comparison.
Published pool fees, conversion costs and withdrawal costs are different charges. A calculator set to zero fees, a gross hashprice index and an actual net credit cannot be ranked as equivalent payouts. The comparison is sorted by the highest available fee-adjusted estimate for each service, or by the selected coin. Gross estimates with unknown fees and unavailable quotes remain unranked at the bottom. Affiliate links do not affect ranking.
For a useful operational comparison, measure net credited coin over the same time window and accepted hashrate, apply the same exchange-rate timestamp, and then account for conversion and withdrawal costs. Keep merged-mining rewards separate until their eligibility and realized value are established.
Block attribution does not prove payout terms
The network page groups the last 144 BCH blocks by observed attribution. A coinbase tag can identify a mining operation, template source or intermediary without proving that it accepts public miners or uses PPS.
JCBCH is an example: substantial observed block share does not establish a public website, signup route, reward scheme or USDT option. It remains a network-attribution entry until those commercial terms can be verified. The directory does not assign it an invented payout model.
All entries summarize published operator statements. They are not proof of successful withdrawals, audited solvency or availability in every jurisdiction. “Not established” fields are intentional; account-only terms and conflicting public pages are identified rather than filled with aggregator estimates.
Explore observed BCH blocks →
